Table of Contents
Could a Sherman tank defeat a Tiger tank?
Against the early-war Panzer III and Panzer IV tanks, the Sherman’s 75mm M3 short-barrel gun was capable of delivering knock-out punches. In 1944, the U.S. fielded the 76mm M1 high-velocity long-barrel gun which could actually penetrate a Tiger’s armor from the front.
Was the Sherman better than the Tiger?
As the film makes clear, a Sherman tank was a lightweight in comparison to a Tiger. The Sherman weighed 33 tonnes and had a 75mm gun, compared to the Tiger’s 54 tonnes and a 88mm gun. A Tiger also had 3.9 inch thick armour, so shells from a Sherman literally bounced off it. Though the film can’t go far enough.
Could a Sherman destroy Tigers?
In the case of the Sherman, the British and the Americans developed two different versions that were capable of taking on the Tiger I. With its 17-pounder anti-tank gun, the Firefly was the only tank that the Western allies had capable of penetrating the Tiger’s frontal armor.
Can a 76mm Sherman penetrate a tiger?
The primary reason why the 76mm was seen as better was its armor penetrating power. The same rounds used in the 76mm gun could penetrate 6 to 7 inches of armor. This was enough to take on the front armor of the Tiger tanks. The 76mm gun was also able to fire shells at a higher velocity.
How did the Allies destroy Tiger tanks?
The Tiger tank was one of the most feared weapons of World War Two. In the war in North Africa in an early encounter with the Allies in Tunisia, eight rounds fired from a 75mm artillery gun simply bounced off of the side of the tank – from a distance of just 50 metres.
Was the Panther better than the Sherman?
The German Panzer-kampf-wagen V (Panther) tank was superior to the American M4 Sherman in almost every respect, but it could not guarantee victory at every encounter. Its 75mm high-velocity weapon, while not as powerful as a Tiger’s 88mm, could easily penetrate a Sherman’s hull or turret at all battlefield distances.
How many tanks did the tiger destroy?
It was in the retreat from Russia that the Tiger proved its defensive qualities that were to hinder both the Russians on the eastern Front and the Allies on the Western Front. On October 18th, 1943, one Tiger led by Sepp Rannel, destroyed 18 Russian tanks.
Was the Sherman a bad tank?
The Sherman M4 medium tank proved to be both a “death trap” for American soldiers and a poor defense against German tanks. However, its use by almost all of the Allied Forces was crucial to their ultimate success in WWII.
What was the best allied tank in ww2?
The T-34, produced in 1940, was arguably the best tank of the war. From the very start, the T-34 achieved that crucial balance between armour, firepower and mobility that eluded British tank designers for so long.
Could a Sherman tank destroy a Panzer?
Could a bazooka destroy a Tiger tank?
Those with tanks and halftracks like to think they are immune to the threat the bazookas pose on our made-up battlefields. However, the facts don’t lie. While Tigers might have been a rolling pillbox, it did have its weak points. Below are a number of instances where bazookas were used to effectively destroy Tigers.
What was the best German tank of ww2?
The Panzerkampfwagen V or Panther was the best German tank of World War II and possibly the best medium tank fielded by any of the combatants in World War II. The other contender for the accolade of best tank is the Soviet T34, earlier versions of which inspired some aspects of the design of the Panther.
How many Shermans to knock out one Tiger?
The 5 Shermans to knock out one Tiger is a half-truth. It took five because shermans worked in groups of 5, whereas Tigers were usually solo or duo. The Panzer Lehr had 6 functional Tiger II tanks in Normandy, and no Tiger Is. The 503rd Heavy Panzer Abt. had 24 Tigers, mostly Tiger IIs.
Are there Sherman tanks that battle Tiger tanks?
Yes they did. But it was rare. Tiger tank were extremely rare. So the chance of a Sherman actually meeting a Tiger were very slim. Only about 1500 Tiger I tanks were made. A large part was used on the Eastern Front. So maybe not more than 500 Tigers would ever be in Western Europe.
What kind of tank was lost by an Allied gun in 1943?
The fist Tiger lost by an allied gun was by a British 6 pounder in the begging of 1943, which was fairly common gun. The Soviets had the T34/85 which can pose a threat to the Tiger, not to mention the SU-152, SU-122. In 1943 the Tiger was fearsome tank but not invulnerable by any means. Delete Replies Reply Reply Anonymous14 July 2013 at 18:42
Why did the US use Tiger tanks in World War 2?
Two Tiger battalions were sent to Normandy. Both were again used against the British forces. In this case, because the northern region of the British was relatively open, and thus suitable for tank warfare. The southern region of the Americans had the bocage landscape, which was a natural barrier against tanks.