Admin Table of Contents
How did a tyranny differ from an oligarchy in ancient Greece?
Oligarchy – rule by a select group of individuals. Tyranny – rule by an individual who had seized power by unconstitutional means.
Why was an oligarchy the best form of government for Sparta?
In the city-state of Sparta, an oligarchy controlled the power. The citizens had little say in the decisions made by the government but, at the time, this was the structure that existed. The Spartans gave up an emphasis on comfort and culture for a more disciplined military approach.
Is an oligarchy tyranny?
Throughout history, oligarchies have often been tyrannical, relying on public obedience or oppression to exist. In his “Iron law of oligarchy” he suggests that the necessary division of labor in large organizations leads to the establishment of a ruling class mostly concerned with protecting their own power.
Which person enjoyed the most rights in ancient Greek society?
Not everyone in Athens was considered a citizen. Only free, adult men enjoyed the rights and responsibility of citizenship. Only about 20 percent of the population of Athens were citizens. Women were not citizens and therefore could not vote or have any say in the political process.
What is known about tyranny in Greece?
tyrant, Greek tyrannos, a cruel and oppressive ruler or, in ancient Greece, a ruler who seized power unconstitutionally or inherited such power. Thus, the opportunity arose for ambitious men to seize power in the name of the oppressed.
Why is Sparta’s government better than Athens?
Sparta is far superior to Athens because their army was fierce and protective, girls received some education and women had more freedom than in other poleis. First, the army of Sparta was the strongest fighting force in Greece. Lastly, Sparta is the best polis of ancient Greece because women had freedom.
What are the pros and cons of oligarchy?
The benefit of having an oligarchy in place is that it consolidates power to one dominant group….List of the 5 Cons of an Oligarchy
- It encourages income inequality.
- It inhibits growth over time.
- It can disrupt the economy.
- It can be restrictive.
- It creates puppet leaders.